How have Russia and China created political separation resulting in strategic ambiguity?

The choice highlighting the creation of instability within countries explains how Russia and China can foster political separation and contribute to strategic ambiguity. When one or both of these nations engage in actions that destabilize other nations—through tactics such as supporting insurgencies, exploiting social unrest, or interfering in political processes—they can create environments of uncertainty and unpredictability.

This instability can prevent nations from forming unified responses or clear alliances, thus contributing to strategic ambiguity. Countries facing internal turmoil may also be less likely to commit to alliances or clear policies against external pressures.

In contrast, while forming alliances with other nations, implementing high-tech defenses, and increasing economic sanctions may have various strategic implications, they focus more on direct inter-state interactions or defense measures rather than the broader impact of destabilization on political clarity and alignment. Therefore, the correct option captures the essence of how creating instability can effectively keep other nations in a state of uncertainty, thereby complicating diplomatic relations and strategic planning.